Compare the Ways the Immigration Process Dehumanises People in Both ‘The Reluctant Fundamentalist’ and ‘The Inheritance of Loss’
Both of these texts show how the immigration process
can be a dehumanising experience but ‘The Inheritance of Loss’ does so in a
more complex way and although they were both published during the same time
period, they are both set in different ones. They both show how the process of
immigration can be dehumanising to different people from different countries,
and in different contexts of time.
‘The Reluctant
Fundamentalist’ is told through the dramatic dialogue of the protagonist
Changez to an implied American listener. The author uses both of these
characters to represent a conversation which he has with himself in order to
understand his emotions and opinions about the events of 9/11, around which the
events of the novel takes place. Hamid uses the character of Changez to
represent how the process of immigration became dehumanising after 9/11 as many
of his Muslim friends ‘began to be questioned and harassed’, which he said in
his article ‘My Reluctant Fundamentalist’.
One of the ways in which
Changez is dehumanised is how when he is returning from his business trip back
to America when he is ‘escorted by armed guards’ and is stripped searched but
the fact that his choice in boxer shorts ‘had no impact on the severe
expressions’ of his inspectors. This shows how Changez is dehumanised because
instead of the guards seeing him as a human being and treating him as such they
see him as a potential threat, represented by their lack of humour and
personality. Dehumanisation through a lack of humanity and personality is also
shown in ‘The Inheritance of Loss’, as they are told where to go by an
‘invisible loudspeaker’, which has connotations of detachment and lack of
emotion, showing how they are being deprived of compassion from the people who
are supposed to be helping them.
Another way in which
Changez is dehumanised is by being asked ‘what is the purpose of your trip to
the United States?’ is a clinical and detached tone and through the woman’s
lack of interest when he says ‘I live here’. This again represents a refusal to
show him compassion. The blunt, impersonal question is also similar to the
questions on the visa form that Biju has fill out in order to be able to go to
America, which are detaches them from and makes their personal life irrelevant,
which would be a dehumanising experience because it is people’s personality
that makes them who they are and human.
Hamid then depicts
Changez sitting on a ‘metal bench next to a tattooed man in handcuffs’. The
handcuffs having connotations of criminality and the metal bench having
connotations having connotations of sterility
and a lack of humanity, also show how the process of immigration is dehumanising
Changez because of the fact that he is being seen again as a potential threat before
being seen as a human.
In ‘The Inheritance of
Loss’ Biju shows the Darwinian ideal of ‘bigger pusher, first place’,
representing how their desperation to get to America has dehumanised them and
caused them to regress into an animalistic mindset to try to have the advantage
over potential competition and to put yourself first before others. This is dehumanising
because the people who were previously filling out their forms together are now
trying to compete with each other. Changez is also dehumanised in a similar way
he says ‘my team did not wait for me’ after he had been inspected, which would
have been a very isolating experience, but his team till put themselves before
Changez.
In conclusion, ‘The Reluctant Fundamentalist’
and ‘The Inheritance of Loss’ both show how the immigration process dehumanises
people through both the main characters being subjected to isolating
experiences as well as not being shown compassion from the people who were supposed
to help them throughout their experience. This is also shown through imagery
such as the lack of humanity in the ‘metal bench’ and the ‘invisible loudspeaker’.